Arguing that there was a reasonable
expectation that the Castle Special Place would be protected, and
that no proper consultation was carried out when the Alberta
government decided to allow logging in that sensitive watershed, the
Castle-Crown Wilderness Coalition and a group of local citizens
announced today that they are initiating a judicial review of the
government’s decision to allow clear cut logging.
“In 1993, the
Natural Resources Conservation Board recommended that the Castle be
protected,” said Gord Petersen, speaking on behalf of the
applicants. “In 1998, the province declared the Castle a Special
Place. The priorities of this designation were to protect watershed
and recreation values in the Castle. Now, some 14 years later, it
remains the only one of 81 Special Places that has not received its
final protective designation. The logging that the Government allowed
to start this winter in the Castle isn’t consistent with a
protected area or the expectations that people had for the Castle’s
protection. Instead of completing the job, the government is allowing
clear-cut logging in what is supposed to be a protected area.”
The application to the court states
that; 1) there was a reasonable expectation given these decisions
that the Castle was already protected; 2) that if the government was
going to allow new logging in the Castle then people should have been
properly consulted; and 3) that the mandate of the government to
protect other values such as water, wildlife, recreation, and the
local tourism economy isn’t being considered in allowing logging to
proceed.
Logging in the Castle by Cochrane-based
Spray Lake Sawmills started in February. This is the first year of
three that logging is scheduled to take place west of Beaver Mines,
Alberta. Groups and many regional residents have been asking the
logging be halted and a Wildland Park be created to provide better
protection for the Castle.
Petersen and others have been
advocating for the protection of the Castle for more than 20 years,
and have been fighting the logging plans since they were announced
two years ago. Recently, local residents and business owners
maintained a protest camp in temperatures as low as –35° C to
raise awareness of logging in the Castle. Several members of that
group were arrested and banned from accessing public land in the
province. Proceedings have since been dropped.
A survey conducted in early 2011 by
Praxis showed that 79% of local residents oppose the logging. In
March 2012, the Southwest Alberta Sustainable
Community Initiative (SASCI) released a Community Values Assessment
that had been requested by the MD of Pincher Creek Council.
From a telephone survey of area residents, it showed that "...the
strongest opposition among residents was for increasing
opportunities for motorized recreation (OHVs,
dirt bikes, etc.), allowing clear
cutting of the Castle Special Management Area, and
subdividing land currently used for
agriculture."
“For years we’ve been telling the
government that people in this area want the Castle protected, not
logged. They haven’t listened. It’s unfortunate, but necessary,
that we turn to the courts to protect this extraordinary landscape.”
The application was filed with the
Court of Queen’s Bench on April 18, 2012.
Have shared on twitter and facebook, hopefully the courts will be able to stop the logging of a beautiful area on the eastern facing slopes of the Rockies( the last sentinels of Alberta hardiness and freedoms.)
ReplyDelete