| Phil Burpee |
Yes, indeed - 'long
live thar noble Queen'. My goodness - how time flies when you're
having fun. Can it be sixty years? Seems like just yesterday that
fresh-faced girl was stepping off the plane from a jolly good outing
at Treetops in Kenya, called home by the tragic death of her father
George VI, our King, and an early victim of a rather over-indulgent
fondness for nicotiana tabacum, aka Virginia Golden Leaf
tobacco, to the tune of about two or three packs a day. George is
now, of course, fondly remembered as the protagonist in the film The
King's Speech, which celebrates his overcoming a debilitating stutter
in order to become the inspirational radio voice of the King and
Emperor of the British Empire during the dark days of the Second
World War. "....Britons never, never, never shall be
slaves."....etc.
Our Queen's mum,
Elizabeth the Queen Mum, that doughty and somewhat gin-soaked old
dear, was famously quoted thusly when asked, during the German
bombardment of London, whether she would send her children out of the
city to the countryside for safety's sake: - "The children
are with me, and I am with the King, and the King is with his
subjects in the time of their greatest peril." Quite
a different take on things from that of another George - 'Dubya' -
who hopped onto Air Force One straight out of a Kindergarten class in
Florida and disappeared for an embarrassing length of time
immediately following the attacks on the World Trade Center on
September 11, 2001. That George, whose Daddy had secured him a nice,
cushy job in the Air National Guard during the Vietnam War, thus
avoiding anything even faintly akin to combat, was to re-emerge in a
scrappy and belligerent mood to lead the forces of the Free World
against the amassing hordes of the Evildoers. And herein lies one of
the great paradoxes of our head of state, the hereditary Monarch,
Queen Elizabeth II. As were her parents, she is both ridiculous and
weirdly admirable, all in one breath. What are we to make of her?
![]() |
| Coronation of Elizabeth, 1953 |
Our system of government
is known as a constitutional monarchy. We have a Parliament
comprising a lower (elected) and upper (appointed) house, the lower
being the Commons (the Rabble), and the upper being the Senate (the
Cud-chewers). The Speaker of the House sits upon the Throne up at the
front of the Commons, the active legislative chamber, to keep an eye
on things and to make sure nobody fires spitballs or unduly lobs
excessively lurid obscenities across the aisle. He or she represents
the Monarch, overseeing the proceedings of government. If things get
really bad, the Speaker can call in the Governor General, who also
represents the Monarch, but does so for the entire country (picture
your teacher in grade six calling in the Principal). Theoretically,
if things got totally out of hand, the Queen herself could be
summoned to attend the chamber and pick up her mace, that
jewel-encrusted battle-club, and thusly brandish it about the
wretched skulls of the Members (picture your Principal calling in the
Superintendent)...... "SILENCE, YOU WORMS!" - even as the
Gentleman of the Black Rod loomed menacingly at the door preventing
any attempted escape.
For the Queen is our
Head of State. She embodies the State. She is the Great Mother. She
is the Boss - the Boss of Bosses. She refers to government in the
possessive form - 'My government, and my Prime Minister' - and the
Opposition self-refers as 'Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition". In
England she is the head of the Anglican Church, her antecedent Henry
VIII having extravagantly boosted the Pope, along with his Roman
Tribe, and assumed his place, intrinsically binding Church and State.
Soberingly, she is also the Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces.
Every man, woman, child, soldier, cop, dog and tree in this vast land
is ultimately under legal obeisance to our Sovereign and her Crown -
an eighty-five year old grandmother with a penchant for
gaily-coloured pill-box hats and a huge, bedraggled, swarming
extended Royal Family of chinless ninnies, vapid reprobates, priapic
Viscounts, latter-day remittance-men, horsey-looking Ladies, bastard
claimants of bastard claimants, fox-hunting buffoons, and a generally
horrible, sorry mob of braying, yachting, holidaying, whining,
grinning, drooling, snivelling, mooching, useless, burden-on-society,
poop-in-the-pants dolts. But such are the vagaries of blind
allegiance to genes. Investing the Supreme Power of the State in the
serendipitous first arrival of one particular sperm amongst a
wriggling steeplechase of 200 million or so was always bound to be a
haphazard business. Witness our King-in-waiting - the oddity known
as Charles - dear oh, dear - if ever there was an argument for
republicanism.................
But now it is the
Diamond Jubilee of the reign of Elizabeth. I was three when she
assumed the throne, and still remember the occasional kerfuffle when
she might pop over to the colony to whiz by the plebs in a big, black
car, variously flanked by scarlet-tuniced Mounties, stopping
occasionally for a 'walkabout' to receive some wilted posies from an
excited little miss, as Prince Philip wandered off to admire some new
pig barn, trying to look engaged as he was offered a detailed
description of the efficiencies of the new proto-type shit-slurry
pond. Let us not forget, however, the estimable underpinnings of
this enigmatic woman. In her youth she was brought up to be
forthright and self-reliant. She trained as a heavy-duty mechanic and
could break down the power-train of a Land Rover or a big Leland
lorry in a jiffy. She learned to ride horses as soon as she could
walk and, in her day, could likely have dusted half the cowboys in
Alberta. She still holds weekly council with the Prime Minister of
Great Britain, and has seen twelve British and eleven Canadian Prime
Ministers come and go. It is perhaps no great fault of her own that
she had foisted upon her a minor functionary of the Greek Royal House
in the person of the regrettable Philip, who proceeded from strength
to strength as a purveyor of racist gaffes and mindless musings and,
other than extruding some royal essence from his loins, seems to have
accomplished little other than traipsing along two strides behind
HRH, taking delight in driving his fancy horse-carriages around the
expansive lawns of Windsor Castle, and maybe blasting the odd
partridge on the moors of Balmoral.
Last summer we
experienced the dreadful and embarrassing spectacle of Will and Kate
'goshing' their way through Alberta. Pert little English buns were
dutifully packed into designer Wranglers, and toothsome Stampede
photo-ops proliferated like unwanted pop-ups. They are fawned over
not because of any particular aspect of their character or any
intrinsic contribution to the wellbeing of humanity. They are
celebrities entirely owing to their happening to be Royals. And they
are deeply wired in to the foundational mechanisms of our
constitution and our system of government. For the very integrity of
our national apparatus of both governance and jurisprudence is
bizarrely invested in the anticipated success of their sexual
congress. Not only must they flutter, as it were, the bloodied sheet
from out their nuptial bedroom window, but woe betide them if they do
not produce yet another mewling Windsor brat at the appointed time.
There is no other purpose for their union. "Hey Will! -
breed or go home, Dude!"
So, maybe it's time to
start thinking about putting an end to this punky charade. What is of
value perhaps is the sequestering of the head of state above the
grimy trials of actual government, with all its whoring and graft and
lies and flimflammery and abrogations and fork-tongued abominations.
In the United States we all too often see the sad spectacle of the
President of the Republic, who is both the head of government and the
head of state, the living embodiment of the nation, being brought low
by either circumstance or incompetence, or both. In a parliamentary
democracy, the Prime Minister is the de facto leader of the country,
but he or she is always buffered from the personification of the
State by the presence, in our case, of the Sovereign, or, as in the
case of India and others, and much preferably, by the appointed or
elected President, who functions much as our Governor General does,
but has no actual power, notwithstanding certain anachronistic but
hollow constitutional attachments to said office. Here, the State
remains aloof and constant above the roilings of the mob. Not a bad
thing.
Queen Elizabeth II is
surely the last of her kind. She has survived the inanities and
pudding-headedness of her vacuous and distracted husband these
sixty-plus years. She has survived the sad, terminal spiral of her
sister Margaret into booze, pills and depression. She has survived
the rebellion, and subsequent martyrdom, of that big-eyed, leggy
party-girl forever embedded in the glam magazines as Princess Di. She
has survived the mind-numbingly awful Camilla, who gave rise to
Charles' infamous tampon reveries. And she has, most sombrely, even
survived the appalling ludicrousness of her own role - that of the
hereditary Queen, monarch of all the teeming masses beneath her. All
this she has done with a certain stolid panache - steaming through
modern history like a grand battle-cruiser-cum-luxury-liner. She has
sought to embody the State with solemnity and steadfastness. She is,
for this, indeed owed a respectful awe.
So I say - Well done,
Your Majesty. Jolly, jolly good. Hip hip hooray. Dei Gratia Regina,
and all that. Forty-one guns - BOOM BOOM BOOM, etc. etc. etc. Thanks
awfully, awfully much for the memories and all the portraits on our
money. But please, please, please spare us the grim fate of having to
deal with your progeny. Fire them all. Fire yourself. Post this job
for a commoner - somebody WE can fire when the going gets weird. Pour
yourself a gin - pull up a cozy spot by the fire - send the Duke
out to fetch a jug of yak's milk - call in the Corgis - unplug the
phone - close your eyes and hum your favourite ditty as you nod off
to a well-deserved slumber: -
"........Send me
victooo-rious, hap-py and glooo-rious, long to-oo re-eign ooo-ver
them.
Go-od saaave thaaa
Queeeeen.”
![]() |
| Time to hang up the royal spurs |
Phil Burpee
February 11, 2012


I think we can safely put you down as a don't know where royalty is concerned. I liked the tenor of the article but you never uses one word where two will do. You suffer from what my mother used to call "verbal diarrhoea." I want you to know that when I served in the RAF I was offered the morning off work if I would go out and wave at one or other of the royal tribe.Work won. At least you colonists have a whole ocean separating you from her, though you are not so lucky with the teapot party to the South.
ReplyDelete